Re: Which is best 386 or 486SX ?

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #840

#840

From: Morten Welinder
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 10:07

14 lines
819 bytes

cohen@cmu.unige.ch writes:

>I am planning to buy a notebook PC. Could anybody advise me
>if there is any advantage taking a 486SX25 over a 386/25 ?
>(I am essentially using a database manager, a word-processor
>along with Excel under Windows 3.1):

1.	486SX is somewhat faster that 386DX.
2.	It has fewer bugs.
3.	It has internal cache.
4.	It is most likely more expensive.

Morten Welinder
terra@diku.dk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct9.100734.26797@odin.diku.dk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!dkuug!diku!terra

References: <1992Oct8.155323.213@cmu.unige.ch>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!dkuug!diku!terra
From: terra@diku.dk (Morten Welinder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Which is best 386 or 486SX ?
Message-ID: <1992Oct9.100734.26797@odin.diku.dk>
Date: 9 Oct 92 10:07:34 GMT
References: <1992Oct8.155323.213@cmu.unige.ch>
Sender: terra@rimfaxe.diku.dk
Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message