Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #900Re: Plural of Pentium (was Re: Why not INTEL586?)
From: Rod Skinner
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 07:10
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 07:10
42 lines
2077 bytes
2077 bytes
In article <BxBnty.4Gn@inews.Intel.COM> dmccart@gomez.intel.com (D. J. McCarthy) writes: >I'm not speaking for Intel in any official manner whatsoever. > >James Jones (jejones@microware.com) wrote: >> steibel@venus.cs.umbc.edu (David M. Steibel) writes: >>> Therefore, with the Pentium increasing performance through the roof, >>> people will be buying an awful lot of Pentiums. > >> Or is that Pentia? Pentiae? Assistance from people who took some Latin >> would be much appreciated. :-) > > > I just came across this pluralized-Pentium(tm) question earlier >today. Basically I think it boils down to this: Pentium is not a >Latin word. If anything, it's an English word. It should therefore >follow standard English pluralization rules. > > One Pentium. Two Pentiums. There is only one way to describe the Pentium (tm) processor. If you want the plural form...it is Pentium processors. ALL trademarks are adjectives and therefore only have ONE form. The noun that the trademark describes can be either singular or plural as you would normally do. Pentium (tm) CPUs Pentium (tm) microprocessors > > >-- >| D. J. McCarthy The moving walkway is now ending; >| dmccart@gomez.intel.com please look down. >| ...!intelhf!mipos3!modl01!dmccart Rod Skinner I speak for myself only. Intel Corp 3065 Bowers Avenue MS NW1-20 PH (408) 765-4474 Santa Clara, CA 95052 FAX (408) 765-4920
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BxC3xv.6Kr@inews.Intel.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!think.com!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!mipos2!rskinnerReferences:
<1992Nov2.155632.28732@microware.com> <BxBnty.4Gn@inews.Intel.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!think.com!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!mipos2!rskinner From: rskinner@mipos2.intel.com (Rod Skinner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Plural of Pentium (was Re: Why not INTEL586?) Message-ID: <BxC3xv.6Kr@inews.Intel.COM> Date: 7 Nov 92 07:10:42 GMT References: <1992Nov2.155632.28732@microware.com> <BxBnty.4Gn@inews.Intel.COM> Sender: news@inews.Intel.COM (USENET News System) Organization: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA USA Lines: 42 Nntp-Posting-Host: mipos2