Re: Tiny Giant vs. PT 68K-2 (actually, OS-9)

Article View: comp.sys.m68k.pc

Article #148

#148

From: James Jones
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1987 14:45

13 lines
1199 bytes

A message comparing two 68K systems says, in part...

>....In addition the board can
>be ordered with OS-9 for the 68K.  I don't know much about this system
>($500) but it comes with a REAL C compiler.   I'm not sure but it might
>be multi tasking/user.

OS-9 is definitely multitasking/multiuser.  SKDOS, as you may have seen
mentioned long ago here, is Peter Stark's clone of the old TSC FLEX OS
for the 6800 and 6809--which evidently has been ported to the 68000.  I
really don't understand why *R-E* has gone that route.

		James Jones

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8710141445.AA23108@mcrware.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!oberon!cit-vax!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!mcrware.UUCP!jejones

References: <871010-061430-2379@Xerox>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!oberon!cit-vax!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!mcrware.UUCP!jejones
From: jejones@mcrware.UUCP (James Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m68k.pc
Subject: Re: Tiny Giant vs. PT 68K-2 (actually, OS-9)
Message-ID: <8710141445.AA23108@mcrware.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Oct-87 10:45:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: mcrware.8710141445.AA23108
Posted: Wed Oct 14 10:45:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Oct-87 05:45:24 EDT
References: <871010-061430-2379@Xerox>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 13
Approved: info-68k@ucbvax.berkeley.edu

Reply to Parent Message