Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #10027Re: WordPerfect for the Mac: Is this a soon-to-be-dead product?
From: Dale Parkyn
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 13:50
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 13:50
57 lines
3543 bytes
3543 bytes
dks@gallant.apple.com (dk smith) writes: >the number of available supplemental books for WordPerfect for Mac are >few and far-between - e.g. a trip to a well-stocked bookstore (near a >University full of Macintoshes) revealed a ratio of WordPerfect for >Windows books to WP for Mac books of 65:1. (!!!) No shit; I couldn't >believe it either. So... is this a dead product? << WordPerfect employees ">Windows books to WP for Mac books of 65:1."? (*My view is my own*) I can understand that the client (Mom) has a desire to use what you was already using, and also commend the investigation of other word processor applications. Have you been carefully analyzing what the needs are? And likely to become in the future? If the new Mac user has some WP skill already ignore the availability of books on a store shelf. Books that are non-manuals often inflate the number of pages with extra words to explain what the manuals do concisely. Perhaps photocopy a few important charts from the manuals for the items that are less often used? If Mom is not very knowledgable yet, or knows an older version of WP for Mac, then maybe there is a beginner's guide type book; thinner is better. I suspect that WordPerfect corp. has a fine set of manuals. Dead product? Do not cars-out-of-production still have value if they do what you want? I suspect that a 'Mom' would appreciate sticking with a piece of software so it becomes thoroughly familiar, efficient, and integrated. Integration - use of two or more applications to accomplish the goal, something the Mac does well. A graphics app is most likely the other app learned. Does your client anticipate eagerly the arrival of the newest music technology? Or any other technology 'improvement'? Help pick out the WP app that will do the job, select secondary apps to assist, provide excellent explainations and patient training. And the BEST ADVICE I CAN OFFER: When something is expalained/demonstrated write it up. Provide references to the user manual(s) for the detailed explanation(s). Provide a clear summary of steps - use your computer skills to make a set of custom notes. Keep one explanation per page, staple together if it takes more pages - then it can be moved to the back of the book. Yes, a book. Three ringer will suffice - "______'s Book of Golden Nuggets" on the cover the reinforce the value of the contents. You think this is silly? The best reason for doing this is that it may save you aggravation from repeated explanations. Make the manuals useful by referencing the useful parts; write those explanations so they can be found, read, and learned when necessary. Do keep the introduction of new information limited, one new task at a time. Do make it easy to locate information, handwritten page references stuck on a wall help. Do introduce a topic when the client appears to have a real need for it. DO know the software well - can you visual the dialogs while talking on the phone - from your vacation site? Just kidding... you hope. Dale parkyn@sfu.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<parkyn.725896207@sfu.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!newsserver.sfu.ca!sfu.ca!parkynReferences:
<1993Jan1.065934.17397@gallant.apple.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!newsserver.sfu.ca!sfu.ca!parkyn From: parkyn@fraser.sfu.ca (Dale Parkyn) Subject: Re: WordPerfect for the Mac: Is this a soon-to-be-dead product? Message-ID: <parkyn.725896207@sfu.ca> Sender: news@sfu.ca Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada References: <1993Jan1.065934.17397@gallant.apple.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 13:50:07 GMT Lines: 58