🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug5.235459.19912@morrow.stanford.edu> HK.MLR@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark Rogowsky) writes:
>In article <1992Aug5.181150.1362@wam.umd.edu>,
>lud@wam.umd.edu () writes:
>>I have been using version 2.1.2 of FaxStf.  I have no problems sending faxes
>>but am having difficulty recieving faxes.  I was wondering if anyone has a
>>later version of FaxStf and if they have had any similar difficulties.  BTW,
>>I am using a Supra V.32bis modem. Rom version 1.000
>
>Are you sure the cable is a good one. Does the modem even answer the
>phone? If not, it's probably the cable. Supra has one for $19.95
>that will work and supports hardware handshaking. Hayes cables don't
>work.

Actually, hardware-handshaking is not used by FAXstf;  if the 
modem works for v.32bis/v.42 data (which does required HH), 
the cable is probably fine.

As for the question, my Supra shipped with v.2.2.0 of FAXstf
and ROM v. 1.200C.  The ROM version is still current, I believe.
According to the Supra manual, FAXsft v.2.2 or later _AND_
ROM v.1.2 or later are required for the fax feature to work
properly.

Supra will supposedly be shipping a newer ROM later this month
to registered owners, so it might be worth waiting a few weeks
to agitate for a new ROM if fax usage is not an immediate concern.


-- 
-- Bill Johnston (johnston@me.udel.edu)
-- 38 Chambers Street; Newark, DE 19711; (302)368-1949