Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #11389Re: MiniCad+4 vs. DesignCAD 3D
From: Michael S Kluskens
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 02:32
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 02:32
14 lines
1037 bytes
1037 bytes
In article <1id427INN2cb@morrow.stanford.edu> lipa@camis.Stanford.EDU (Bill Lip a) writes: > >Has anyone compared MiniCad+4 and DesignCAD 3D? ... If you want to try out DesignCAD 2D/3D call (918/825-4848), fax (918/825/6359), or write (DesignCAD, Inc., One American Way, Pryor, OK 74361) them for a demo disk. I have DesignCAD 2D/3D, but haven't had the need to really use it yet. The two people I lent my demo disk to also plan on getting it. Michael Kluskens kluskens@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan7.023241.23374@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!kluskensReferences:
<1id427INN2cb@morrow.stanford.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!kluskens From: kluskens@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Michael S Kluskens) Subject: Re: MiniCad+4 vs. DesignCAD 3D Message-ID: <1993Jan7.023241.23374@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: bottom.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu Organization: The Ohio State University References: <1id427INN2cb@morrow.stanford.edu> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 02:32:41 GMT Lines: 14