Re: GifConverter or JPEGView better?

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps

Article #11510

#11510

From: Don Rainwater
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 22:06

10 lines
1113 bytes

	      I've tried both GIFconverter and JPEGview on my 8-bit, 8Mb Mac II. 
As another poster has already mentioned, JPEGview requires less memory to
do its thing.  Aside from that, JPEGview seems to do a better job of
quantizing images so that they look good in 8 bits.  JPEG files appear much
less grainy using JPEGview.

       Of course, as always, your mileage may vary. :)
--
Don Rainwater, Systems Manager, Univ of Cincinnati Center for IT Services
Don.Rainwater@UC.Edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Don.Rainwater-080193170434@ucrain.san.uc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!ucbeh.san.uc.edu!ucrain.san.uc.edu!user

References:

<1993Jan6.045829.23642@news.duc.auburn.edu> <petere-070193124038@129.83.90.13> <1993Jan7.194858.15934@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!ucbeh.san.uc.edu!ucrain.san.uc.edu!user
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: GifConverter or JPEGView better?
Message-ID: <Don.Rainwater-080193170434@ucrain.san.uc.edu>
From: Don.Rainwater@UC.Edu (Don Rainwater)
Date: 8 Jan 93 17:06:33 EST
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.apps
References: <1993Jan6.045829.23642@news.duc.auburn.edu> <petere-070193124038@129.83.90.13> <1993Jan7.194858.15934@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>
Distribution: world
Organization: Univ of Cinti Center for IT Services
Nntp-Posting-Host: ucrain.san.uc.edu
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message