Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #11710Re: MacMoney? Who knows about it?
From: Kathleen Riggle
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:02
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:02
51 lines
2810 bytes
2810 bytes
In article <1993Jan12.020055.4194@verity.com> Anders Wallgren <anders@verity.com> writes: >In article <1993Jan11.080704.5971@henson.cc.wwu.edu> John Hatten, >n7949188@henson.cc.wwu.edu writes: >>I've been seeing lot of discussion about Managing Your Money, and >Quicken, >>but very little about MacMoney. Is this software still being made? >Are the >>other two better? > >I used MacMoney for about two years, but switched to Quicken about >a year ago. Me too! >The MacMoney interface just got to me in the end. It's very modal: >you can't have more than one account open at a time, and the >windows are fixed size. There was also this annoying memory-saving >'feature' which loads a set number of records into memory at any >one time and you have to page through the sets by hitting a >next/previous button (in addition to the scroll bar). All in all, >it worked, but the interface definately showed that it was designed >quite a few years ago when all Macintoshes had 9" screens and >little memory. Reconciliation of an account was annoying also. If you made a mistake in entering a check amount (something I do at least once a month) you had to quit reconciliation, fix the erroneous amount and start up reconciliation again. In Quicken, you can just double click on the check that needs fixing, fix it and keep on going. My husband misses MacMoney because it did pie charts and Quicken doesn't. However, the pie charts weren't completely accurate (for what we wanted to see). If you made $1,000 and only spent $800, the pie chart showed a breakdown of the $800. It didn't show the $200 that you indirectly had saved. We also got a good laugh out of the cash flow trend graph. It always showed our cash flow going "down the toliet" no matter how much money we had saved. I don't quite remember why this was so; it could be that we would save for 3 or 4 months and then have a big expense. Still, cash flow was positive. In all fairness, at that time we didn't track all our savings accounts and investments, so I don't think the shortcomings of the cash flow trend were completley MacMoney's fault. So, our finances aren't quite as fun now with Quicken, but they are definitely easier to handle. :-) Kathie -- riggle@mv.us.adobe.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan12.210212.18239@adobe.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!decwrl!adobe!riggleReferences:
<1993Jan11.080704.5971@henson.cc.wwu.edu> <1993Jan12.020055.4194@verity.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!decwrl!adobe!riggle From: riggle@adobe.com (Kathleen Riggle) Subject: Re: MacMoney? Who knows about it? Message-ID: <1993Jan12.210212.18239@adobe.com> Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS) Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated, Mountain View References: <1993Jan11.080704.5971@henson.cc.wwu.edu> <1993Jan12.020055.4194@verity.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:02:12 GMT Lines: 51