Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #11718Re: GifConverter or JPEGView better?
From: Bart Sears
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 03:04
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 03:04
25 lines
1632 bytes
1632 bytes
In article <1993Jan6.045829.23642@news.duc.auburn.edu> gmarfoe@eng.auburn.edu writes: >Which of the latest releases (I can't remember the version numbers) of >GIFConverter or JPEGView are better for viewing JPEG (.jpg) files on an >8-bit color system with 640 x 480 resolution? > For viewing JPEG files on an 8-bit system I would strongly recommend using JPEGView. It does a very good job of quantization for 8-bit systems. JPEGView is also cheaper (postcardware vs. shareware) and uses significantly less memory. There are differences in the user interface which may influence your decession. As I recall, for images larger than the screen, GIFConverter puts your image in a scroll window while JPEGView scales it to fit on the screen. I have not tried GIFConverter recently, so it may have some of these features, but some of the "nice" features of JPEGView include: slide show mode, easy to set file type on downloaded images, nice mac interface (good help system and user preferences), able to use full screen, etc. >Do these require Quicktime 1.5, or are they compatible with Quicktime 1.0? > JPEGView is compatable with QT 1.0. Bart
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan13.030440.19021@cello.hpl.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!cello!searsReferences:
<1993Jan6.045829.23642@news.duc.auburn.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!cello!sears From: sears@cello.hpl.hp.com (Bart Sears) Subject: Re: GifConverter or JPEGView better? Message-ID: <1993Jan13.030440.19021@cello.hpl.hp.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 03:04:40 GMT References: <1993Jan6.045829.23642@news.duc.auburn.edu> Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Keywords: GifConverter, JPEGView, latest releases Lines: 25