Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #11907Re: How much loss with multiple JPEG saves.
From: Jeff Yaplee
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:42
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:42
52 lines
3044 bytes
3044 bytes
In article <1993Jan24.050302.4130@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>, m_herodotus@csc32.enet.dec.com (Mario Herodotus) writes... > >-- >I was wondering how this would work... > >I save an image using Photoshop's JPEG export. I later open the image using >Photoshop's JPEG aquire and edit the image. I now save the new image using >Photoshop's JPEG export again. Does the new image suffer more loss due to >compression a second time around? Does the new image have only the same >loss as the first time the original was saved? How would this affect an >image that is saved/opened several times with JPEG compression? Does it >suffer more loss each time it is saved? > >Thanks, >Mario > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I can't afford my own opinions, and DEC won't pay for them either. >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Mario Herodotus (CX03 1/K3) | m_herodotus@csc32.dec.com >Digital Equipment Corporation | >Customer Support Center | or m_herodotus%csc32.dec@decwrl.dec.com >305 Rockrimmon Blvd. | >Colorado Springs, CO 80919 | or ...!decwrl!csc32.dec.com!m_herodotus > | >(800) 354-9000 Ext 25520 | or CSC32::M_HERODOTUS >[direct line (719) 592-5520] | >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mario, Imagine meeting you here on the Usenet :^). Anyway, theoretically yes you will suffer image loss everytime you recompress the image. Storm Technologies recommends that you do all your editing on a Photoshop file, and then save it as a JPEG file for archiving the file. Now for the pragmatic answer. I have played around with doing this, and can't notice any degradation of the image even after 10 times (this is assuming that you save the image with a Q=90 value - I think that's the excellent value on the PS JPEG module). When I played around with Q values of 75, I would get noticeable degradation of the image after a couple of saves. I typically only use a Q value of 90 to maintain the quality of the image. This still gives me reasonable compression of the image (about 1/10th the size of the original). One thing I have noticed is that sometimes the JPEG file gets larger with every save. Hope this helps. Jeff yaplee@h2olog.seo.dec.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan24.065455.5507@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!stanford.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!h2olog.enet.dec.com!yapleeReferences:
<1993Jan24.050302.4130@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!stanford.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!h2olog.enet.dec.com!yaplee From: yaplee@h2olog.enet.dec.com (Jeff Yaplee) Subject: Re: How much loss with multiple JPEG saves. Message-ID: <1993Jan24.065455.5507@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> Sender: usenet@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com (USENET News System) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation References: <1993Jan24.050302.4130@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> Distribution: comp Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:42:15 GMT Lines: 53