Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #1204Word vs. Nisus vs. FM vs. WN
From: Russell Owen
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 19:17
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 19:17
85 lines
4466 bytes
4466 bytes
Somebody posted asking about Word 5 vs. Nisus. I have a short summary of
features here that may be of interest, and also includes FrameMaker (FM)
and WriteNow (WN). I have tried to show only the most important features,
but I'm sure to have missed some others really care about. A few were left
off (such as spell checking) because all have it. I am missing other word
processors such as MacWrite and Taste, about which I know nothing. Also, I
have tried to be accurate, but may have made some errors.
My conclusion? FrameMaker is the most powerful word processor in this set.
WriteNow and Nisus are the easiest to use (WriteNow is a bit easier, but
much less powerful). Word is a reasonable compromise in features, but is
hampered by slow speed and poor design. I personally use Nisus for simple
stuff and source code editing, FrameMaker for papers and other things with
complex formatting.
-- Russell
owen@astro.washington.edu
Word 5 Nisus 3 FM 3 WN 3
Full Undo ? yes no ?
Multiple Undo! no yes! no no
Open very large docs yes no! yes yes
Column Select yes yes no no
Discontiguous Select no yes no no
Search by Style some yes yes no?
Grep (regular expr.) some best some no?
Find/Repl in selection yes yes yes no
Clone Case no no yes no
Search unopened docs ? yes ? no
Hierarchical Styles yes no no best
Named Char. Styles no! painful yes best
Named Para. Styles yes painful yes best
Start para. where? no no yes no
Style Sheets no no yes ?
Space after para yes yes yes yes
Space before para yes no yes no
Widow Control yes no! flex. no
Multiple Columns yes yes yes yes
Fancier Layout no no yes no
Graphics Editor yes yes best no
Margin follows graphic ? yes no no
Hide margins/pagebreaks yes yes no no
Settable Cmd-Keys yes best no no
Open any file no? yes no no
Multiple clipboards no? yes no no
Tables painful no yes no
Outlining painful no no no
Equations yes no best no
Macros no yes no no
Glossary yes yes ? no
Print merge painful yes ? yes
Hyphenation yes yes flex yes
Auto-# Footnotes yes yes yes yes
Auto-# Endnotes yes yes usexref no!
Auto-# Paragraphs no no yes no
Auto-# Figures etc no no yes no
Cross-references ? yes best no
Hypertext no no painful no
Doc Linking ? yes yes no
Publish/Subscr ? no no no
Indexing poor poor decent? no
Table-of-contents poor poor decent? no
Support for books ? no yes no
Source code editing poor good poor poor
Avail for other comp? PC none unix,PC ?
Translation required? RTF none!
Speed slow fast medium fastest
Ease of Use poor fair poor good
Power good fair best poor
Reliability poor good ? good
Size huge big huge small
Price med med high low
Interface poor fair fair fair
Frequency of Updates fair fair ? poor
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<owen-100892120844@astmac1.geology.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!plains!news.u.washington.edu!astmac1.geology.washington.edu!userShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!plains!news.u.washington.edu!astmac1.geology.washington.edu!user From: owen@astro.washington.edu (Russell Owen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Word vs. Nisus vs. FM vs. WN Message-ID: <owen-100892120844@astmac1.geology.washington.edu> Date: 10 Aug 92 19:17:15 GMT Article-I.D.: astmac1.owen-100892120844 Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.apps Organization: University of Washington Lines: 85