Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #1382Re: Microsoft Bashing (Was: Re: News from Microsoft)
From: Bill St. Croix
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 19:03
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 19:03
59 lines
3433 bytes
3433 bytes
In article <1992Apr3.013247.2148@eff.org> hshubs@eff.org (Howard Shubs) writes: >In article <1992Mar31.213207.12639@ultra.com> stcroix@ultra.com (Bill St. Croix) writes: >> >>In case you haven't heard....$99 to upgrade from Excel 3.0 to 4.0. What >>a great scam...get a good share of the market and then dollar your users >>to death once a year. > >So you feel that they shouldn't make a good profit on their work in >upgrading a product? I think that charging $99 for an upgrade that is supposed to make the product easier to use is ridiculous. If you remember correctly, that was what Excel 3.0 was supposed to do. Especially a little over ONE year after that release. If you paid $200 for 2.2 and paid $129 for the 3.0 upgrade, now you need to paid (maybe not "need") the $99 for the next upgrade...you've just paid $430 for 4.0. Yes, I know....you have used the product for "all those years". What about the Word upgrade. If you were still using Word 1, you could upgrade to 5.0 for the SAME price as the upgrade from 4.0! Is that *fair*?? I don't think so. I have no problem with a company making money off of the original product and upgrades, but charging 33-50% of the original price once a year (or every other year) seems a bit extreme. I know a lot of companys and individuals that are not going to Word 5.0 as a company purchase due to the cost. I think that the same thing will happen with Excel. I know my company is doing this considering that it will cost us upwards of 10k to upgrade or 80 Macs to Word 5.0....and another 8k or so in a few months for Excel. Sure, it is a *cost of doing business*, but when will it slow? >>My personal favorite is the *personalization* of the original floppies... >>one of the WORST "features" anyone has ever implemented for any reason. > >You mean you actually _use_ the original floppies for installation??!? No...I have to copy the original (INSTALLER disk ONLY) ever time a new user gets a copy of Word 5.0. I use the same 4 other back up disks for the other installations. Also, it is NEVER stated in the WORD 5.0 "Getting Started" manual that one should backup ones disks! Therefore *some* (NOTE SOME) people think that they *have* to use the original disks! It seems obvious to me that Microsoft either forgot to include this in the manual, thought *everyone* "knows" to make backups first, or they WANT the originals personalized! > Shaking head in amazement... After you stop shaking, just consider how many "non-techies" use the original disks for installations or do the install just as the manual reads! Bill -- Bill St. Croix Ultra Network Technologies Systems Administrator 101 Daggett Drive stcroix@ultra.com San Jose, CA 95134 Detroit Red Wings - '92 Stanley Cup Champs! (408) 922-0100 ext. 287
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr7.190317.14361@ultra.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!mips!ultra!stcroixReferences:
<Mar.31.10.14.44.1992.21559@gandalf.rutgers.edu> <1992Mar31.182908.15866@a.cs.okstate.edu> <1992Mar31.213207.12639@ultra.com> <1992Apr3.013247.2148@eff.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!mips!ultra!stcroix From: stcroix@ultra.com (Bill St. Croix) Subject: Re: Microsoft Bashing (Was: Re: News from Microsoft) Message-ID: <1992Apr7.190317.14361@ultra.com> Reply-To: stcroix@ultra.com (Bill St. Croix) Organization: Ultra Network Technologies References: <Mar.31.10.14.44.1992.21559@gandalf.rutgers.edu> <1992Mar31.182908.15866@a.cs.okstate.edu> <1992Mar31.213207.12639@ultra.com> <1992Apr3.013247.2148@eff.org> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 19:03:17 GMT Lines: 59