🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #1670

Re: WriteNow2.2 -> 3.0, good idea?

#1670
From: Bill Biesty
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 18:26
20 lines
1395 bytes
In article <871323o.702182986@aucs> 871323o@aucs.acadiau.ca (Oliver Oey) writes:
>I had just started reading this newsgroup.  I wasn't aware that an upgrade
>offer for WriteNow2.2 to version 3 is available, until I came across the
>postings on assembly code implementation of WriteNow.  In fact, I didn't even
>know that version 3 is out.  I have been a happy user of WriteNow2.2 for
>quite some time now.  I am just wondering if the upgrade is worthwhile.
>Could someone please post the major differences between the two versions
>of WriteNow?  If the topic has already been discussed, would someone be
>kind enough to email me a quick summary?  Thanks.

Well no one can compare it because its not shipping until the end of April.
The biggest change is it will support style sheets and write out MS Word
format. I forget what the other changes are. If you call their 800 number
I'm sure they would tell you.



--
Bill Biesty
<biesty@ide.com>     These are not the opinions of my employer.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Apr11.182607.23612@ide.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ide!biesty
References: <871323o.702182986@aucs>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ide!biesty
From: biesty@ide.com (Bill Biesty)
Subject: Re: WriteNow2.2 -> 3.0, good idea?
Message-ID: <1992Apr11.182607.23612@ide.com>
Keywords: WriteNow upgrade wordprocessor
Sender: root@ide.com (Operator)
Organization: IDE, San Francisco
References: <871323o.702182986@aucs>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 18:26:07 GMT
Lines: 20