Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #1670Re: WriteNow2.2 -> 3.0, good idea?
From: Bill Biesty
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 18:26
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 18:26
20 lines
1395 bytes
1395 bytes
In article <871323o.702182986@aucs> 871323o@aucs.acadiau.ca (Oliver Oey) writes: >I had just started reading this newsgroup. I wasn't aware that an upgrade >offer for WriteNow2.2 to version 3 is available, until I came across the >postings on assembly code implementation of WriteNow. In fact, I didn't even >know that version 3 is out. I have been a happy user of WriteNow2.2 for >quite some time now. I am just wondering if the upgrade is worthwhile. >Could someone please post the major differences between the two versions >of WriteNow? If the topic has already been discussed, would someone be >kind enough to email me a quick summary? Thanks. Well no one can compare it because its not shipping until the end of April. The biggest change is it will support style sheets and write out MS Word format. I forget what the other changes are. If you call their 800 number I'm sure they would tell you. -- Bill Biesty <biesty@ide.com> These are not the opinions of my employer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr11.182607.23612@ide.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ide!biestyReferences:
<871323o.702182986@aucs>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ide!biesty From: biesty@ide.com (Bill Biesty) Subject: Re: WriteNow2.2 -> 3.0, good idea? Message-ID: <1992Apr11.182607.23612@ide.com> Keywords: WriteNow upgrade wordprocessor Sender: root@ide.com (Operator) Organization: IDE, San Francisco References: <871323o.702182986@aucs> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 18:26:07 GMT Lines: 20