🚀 go-pugleaf

  For those who are knowledgeable of Prograph v2.5 (i.e., purchased
  and/or  experimented  with the package), I'd like to ask you what
  you think of it.  In particular,

    * Does it have a steeper learning curve than conventional Mac
      application programming (say, using THINK C v5.0.2)?

    * Are the OO capabilities well designed?  Is graphical programming
      of this genre faster and better than other well-established
      CASE tools?  (Is Oracle a good comparison?)

    * Since both Prograph and THINK C are  sold  at  a  low  market
      price of approx. $199.00 (though I'm sure THINK  C  can  be  
      purchased at lower
      educational prices, but I need to check that out), which one
      would you suggest me to use in order to actually learn Mac
      application programming?  Let's say that my intentions are
      geared toward industry requisites (for instance, I've worked
      with X11R4, so that falls within "industry-based" application 
      production software).

  I don't expect a stampede of respondents, so you can
  go ahead and post your opinion/answers and I'll read
  your [public] postings.

  I appreciate your advices beforehand.

  --Javier
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Javier H. Seen, TA,   CS Dept, UT-Austin, TX 78712    <javier@cs.utexas.edu>
(O)471-9709, (H)473-2361     | "I wanna be like Mike" (Mike Burton, that is)
Office: PAI 5.68, M-S 18h-5h | "Why do .signature files hafta be SO short?"