Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #2436Re: In Control vs Daymaker?
From: Brian Hanafee
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 00:10
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 00:10
69 lines
3549 bytes
3549 bytes
>In article <1992Aug18.143413.29968@wixer.cactus.org>, purp@wixer.cactus.org (Jim Meyer) wrote: >> However, I feel obliged to tell you that MacUser panned DayMaker as "the >> interface you'll love to hate." [paraphrased by yours truly from their >> review] Apparently it's not so hot for day to day use. I've also been >> looking at DateBook (I think this is the one I'll buy; it's VERY >> comparable in features to DayMaker) and First Things First, which sounds >> comparable to In Control. Be careful about DateBook. I just returned it (to MacZone) after using it for under an hour. I got it mainly because I wanted to print datebook pages, and I was severely dissappointed. It can display in several handy formats, but printing is brain-damaged. It can't print one month across two pages; instead the best you can get is one month sideways on each page. It insists that it can print three pages worth of DayRunner filler on one 8 1/2 x 11 sheet of paper, even though it comes out way too narrow. It can't print any view other than "list" in weekly fillers (see below). The advertized "network" features aren't there: you get a little note in the box telling you that it will be sent to you for free as soon as it's ready. I took a quick look at DayMaker, at it seems to have the following well-developed features: Handles schedules Handles addresses Keeps track of contacts Views are highly customizable The big missing feature in my eyes is that it only has one graphical view of schedules: Gantt charts. You can't seem to set it up to display and print schedules in the same format as a normal DayRunner: 8:00 _________ 9:00 _________ 10:00 Coffee___ 11:00 Donuts___ 12:00 Lunch____ 1:00 _________ 2:00 _________ 3:00 Meeting__ ..etc. Instead, you get either a compressed list format: 10:00 Coffee 11:00 Donuts 12:00 Lunch 3:00 Meeting or the Gantt chart, which I won't attempt using ASCII. In article <sholden-180892134606@intrepid.nosc.mil> sholden@cod.nosc.mil (Steve Holden) writes: >DayMaker does have some annoyances though ... especially with >printing (to those day planners) and exporting information. So far, the best I've found for printing is Now-Up-to-Date, with the caveat that it doesn't handle double-sided printing very gracefully at all--the manual just tells you to tape pages back to back if you want double sided stuff. The printout is much better than DateBook, and I think better than DayMaker as well. Also, the Now-Up-to-Date networking features are really handy for dividing your calendar up into groups and categories, even if aren't really networking with anyone else at all. -- Brian Hanafee Advanced Decision Systems bhanafee@ads.com 1500 Plymouth Street (415) 960-7300 Mountain View, CA 94043-1230
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BHANAFEE.92Sep3161000@picasso.ads.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!ads.com!saturn!bhanafeeReferences:
<1992Aug18.074504.13167@rdg.dec.com> <1992Aug18.143413.29968@wixer.cactus.org> <sholden-180892134606@intrepid.nosc.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!ads.com!saturn!bhanafee From: bhanafee@picasso.ads.com (Brian Hanafee) Subject: Re: In Control vs Daymaker? In-Reply-To: sholden@cod.nosc.mil's message of Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:52:00 GMT Message-ID: <BHANAFEE.92Sep3161000@picasso.ads.com> Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.apps Sender: usenet@ads.com (USENET News) Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Mountain View, CA 94043, +1 (415) 960-7300 References: <1992Aug18.074504.13167@rdg.dec.com> <1992Aug18.143413.29968@wixer.cactus.org> <sholden-180892134606@intrepid.nosc.mil> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 00:10:00 GMT Lines: 69