Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #2943Re: Superclock and 32-bit mode
From: tcwan
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 15:13
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 15:13
23 lines
1361 bytes
1361 bytes
In article <12430@cis.rand.org>, hanser@rand.org (Larry Hanser) writes: > I loved Superclock until I figured out that it was conflicting with MS > Word. It was doing weird things to the screen--it screwed-up the text > wrapping as I was typing. It didn't do anything permanently bad to the > text, i.e., if I scrolled the badly wrapped text off the screen and back > on, it was fine. But it was annoying. I stopped using Superclock [I followed the thread in reply with regards to Superclock, and it makes more sense now] Are you using Truetype + Word 4.0? This combination will cause the effect you described. I'm not sure if it is cured by using an INIT called "Word TrueType INIT" -- it's free. Come to think of it, it might be for printing to Stylewriters. Well, this problem is cured in 5.0. > because of this and have been afraid to use it since, though I would > really like to have a clean version of it. t.c. Grad Student, Univ. of Miami, FL
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep12.111339.13871@umiami.ir.miami.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!news.miami.edu!umiami!tcwanReferences:
<1992Sep10.213950.3842@mips2.ma30.bull.com> <12430@cis.rand.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!news.miami.edu!umiami!tcwan From: tcwan@umiami.ir.miami.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Superclock and 32-bit mode Message-ID: <1992Sep12.111339.13871@umiami.ir.miami.edu> Date: 12 Sep 92 11:13:38 EDT References: <1992Sep10.213950.3842@mips2.ma30.bull.com> <12430@cis.rand.org> Organization: Univ of Miami IR Lines: 23