Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #3370PageMaker, Quark XPress, & Print Shops
From: Jim Rosenberg
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 1990 01:46
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 1990 01:46
20 lines
1612 bytes
1612 bytes
I don't yet have a desktop publishing program, but will probably get one in the
next few months. Based on the reviews I've read so far, I'm inclined toward
Quark XPress, though it's a close call. Recently my wife called several print
shops to get an estimate on a job, and asked them if they could handle a Mac
floppy. Several mentioned that they could grok PageMaker, but she *said* no
one mentioned Quark XPress. Of course she did this before telling me she was
gonna do it, thereby before I had a chance to tell her to ask about Quark
XPress ...
How serious a problem is this? One local printer I go to doesn't use WriteNow,
but I always include the app on a floppy when I take it in so he can just
double-click on the icon on my disk. Same thing for SuperPaint. He doesn't
object to this. Has anyone had a bad experience from having files created by
program X and then finding that the print shop of choice could only grok
program Y? Is it really true that PageMaker is a safer bet here than XPress?
--
Jim Rosenberg
CIS: 71515,124 decvax!idis! \
WELL: jer allegra! ---- pitt!amanue!jr
BIX: jrosenberg uunet!cmcl2!cadre! /
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<476@amanue.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!amanue!jrShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!amanue!jr From: jr@amanue.UUCP (Jim Rosenberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: PageMaker, Quark XPress, & Print Shops Message-ID: <476@amanue.UUCP> Date: 16 Jul 90 01:46:15 GMT Distribution: comp Organization: Amanuensis Inc., Grindstone, PA Lines: 20