🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <78@alchemy.UUCP> hzink@alchemy.UUCP (Harry K. Zink) writes:
>
>Personally I really do not see the use in all this fuss over putting 
>disinfectant with a minimum system on a floppy.  What is the problem?  Those 
>that know how to create such disk wouldnot waste their time downloading suhc a 
>huge file, and those who are clueless about creating a system disk with just 
>system and finder plus the disinfectant application on it, will most likely 
>also by baffled by the taks of using Diskcopy or Stuffit to create their disk.
>
>Could someone please clarify to 'moi' poor lost soul why this seems to be such 
>an important issue?

Well, I don't know if it is an *important* issue, but I thought an
application that automatically puts Disinfectant and a minimal system
on a floppy would be nice for users less technical than ourselves.

Granted, if Stuffit and DiskCopy were used, it would be pointless.
What I had in mind was a file that you download and then double-click
on to activate.  It would then create the Disinfectant bootable floppy
automatically.  All the user would do is lock and label the floppy.

Using the auto-unstuffing application doesn't quite fit what I'm
thinking about since you would only get the *files* and not the
original disk *image*.  I think the image would best since you
could be sure that the resulting disk was clean.  In the file
scenario you possibly put the files on an already infected floppy.

-- 
   /   George D. Nincehelser           \  uunet!swbatl!george       \
  / /   Southwestern Bell Telephone     \  Phone: (314) 235-6544     \
 / / /   Advanced Technology Laboratory  \  Fax:  (314) 235-5797      \
/ / / /\  1010 Pine, St. Louis, MO 63101  \  de asini umbra disceptare \