🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #3616

LaTex, Quark Xpress, Pagemaker, Framemaker

#3616
From: Robert Steffen
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 1990 00:03
32 lines
1429 bytes
So, this is my question.. Which of these packages
LaTex,OsTec, Quark Xpress, Pagemaker or Framemaker 
should I be using for text processing?

Actually this should probably be broken down into
several categories..
1, We need a version of Tex (with the macros= textures?) at
our facility - Ostec has been recommended to meet this need 
on the Mac.. How portable is this between Unix and the Mac?
completely? just FTP?

2. We also need a desktop publishing package and
I've been hearing that Quark Xpress is the way to go
(over Pagemaker, which I happen to be familiar with),
however, what is FrameMaker offering us? is it
supposed to take the place of either of these two 
packages?

3.  Should the Ostec/Latex people be using Frame 
on the Mac, or are they just two different beasts.



There you have it, 
another case of my ignorance..

Thanks for any help,

Bob Steffen

(no .sig file!)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1990Aug9.000336.28580@riacs.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!shelby!riacs!solstice.riacs.edu!rsteffen

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!shelby!riacs!solstice.riacs.edu!rsteffen
From: rsteffen@solstice.riacs.edu (Robert Steffen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: LaTex, Quark Xpress, Pagemaker, Framemaker
Message-ID: <1990Aug9.000336.28580@riacs.edu>
Date: 9 Aug 90 00:03:36 GMT
Sender: news@riacs.edu (James A. Woods)
Reply-To: rsteffen@solstice.riacs.edu (Robert Steffen)
Organization: Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science
Lines: 32