Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #437A/UX 3.0 vs. MachTen 2.0
From: Charles Albrecht
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 22:34
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 22:34
24 lines
1683 bytes
1683 bytes
Has anyone had any experience with either of these products, or made some
sort of comparison? Each seems to have its own merits, but are there any
serious problems with one or the other? Kudos? Flames?
(A/UX and MachTen are UNIX implementations for the Macintosh.)
{A/UX is a System V - BSD hybrid, requires 68030 w/PMMU (or 040) (32 bit mode)
& special disk formatting. It runs Mac OS as a UNIX process.
MachTen is BSD (Carnegie Mellon Mach kernel), runs on 68000 - 040, using
native mac file system. It runs as a Mac application.}
Email or post replies - will summarize if helpful.
Charles
Charles Albrecht "Nonsense, they only say you can't
charlesa@ncar.ucar.edu escape from The Fire Swamp becuase
303/497-1828 no one ever has."
- Westley, The Dread Pirate Roberts
NCAR - Scientific Computing Division * P.O. Box 3000 * Boulder, Colorado 80307
The opinions you are about to have read are ficticious...
...any similarity to opinions living or dead is purely coincidental.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul21.223426.20299@ncar.ucar.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!niwot.scd.ucar.edu!charlesaReferences:
<1992Jul14.145224.1061@MITL.COM> <1992Jul21.214122.14919@spool.cs.wisc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.unix.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!niwot.scd.ucar.edu!charlesa From: charlesa@niwot.scd.ucar.edu (Charles Albrecht) Subject: A/UX 3.0 vs. MachTen 2.0 Message-ID: <1992Jul21.223426.20299@ncar.ucar.edu> Sender: news@ncar.ucar.edu (USENET Maintenance) Organization: Scientific Computing Divison/NCAR Boulder, CO References: <1992Jul14.145224.1061@MITL.COM> <1992Jul21.214122.14919@spool.cs.wisc.edu> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 22:34:26 GMT Lines: 24