Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #6181Re: MACINTAX vs. TURBOTAX
From: James Preston
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 1990 18:49
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 1990 18:49
15 lines
1362 bytes
1362 bytes
In article <20885.27787187@merrimack.edu> rand@merrimack.edu writes: >Hmmm, I used the 1989 version of Macintax and it included all of the >above except for the dubious audit checking. I was very happy with it. The problem I have with MacinTax is that it is too damned expensive. I bought it last year for the first time and it cost something like $80. Ok, fine, I'm sure a lot of work went into it. But then a few weeks ago I get the notice for the 1990 "upgrade". They want $50 for it! That is simply obscene! There just can't be that many differences between the 1989 forms and the 1990 forms to warrant them charging me that much for a wrongly-named "upgrage". Given that the price for TurboTax off the shelf is the same as the "upgrade" for MacinTax, I see no reason not to switch this year. (Are you listening, Russ?) --James Preston
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2353@key.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!amdahl!key!jspReferences:
<1990Dec18.190805.17885@mentor.com> <45114@cci632.UUCP> <20885.27787187@merrimack.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!amdahl!key!jsp From: jsp@key.COM (James Preston) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: MACINTAX vs. TURBOTAX Message-ID: <2353@key.COM> Date: 28 Dec 90 18:49:55 GMT References: <1990Dec18.190805.17885@mentor.com> <45114@cci632.UUCP> <20885.27787187@merrimack.edu> Reply-To: jsp@penguin.key.COM (James Preston) Distribution: na Organization: Key Computer Laboratories, Fremont Lines: 15