Re: Compactor - A reason not to use - Article 6954 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps

Article #6954

Re: Compactor - A reason not to use

#6954

From: mididoc
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 1991 05:48

14 lines
905 bytes

I thought the main aim behind archiver programs were to reduce (a)
storage and (b) net-traffic. Anthing wchich does it better is good.

As was previously said, Compactor and the BinHQX Da is an unbeatable
combination.

As for StuffIt Deluxe ... BLYECCH!!! (IMNSHO!) SI Classic is faster
anyway! The only thing SI Deluxe really has going for it is JPEG - 
I can do it standalone anyway. There is no reason to have everything
in one package, y'know ...


Geoff Peters             mididoc@peg.pegasus.oz.au

Technical Details

Message-ID: <252200004@peg>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!sunaus.oz!softway!peg!mididoc

References: <5490@crystal9.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!sunaus.oz!softway!peg!mididoc
From: mididoc@peg.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: Compactor - A reason not to use
Message-ID: <252200004@peg>
Date: 13 Jan 91 05:48:55 GMT
References: <5490@crystal9.uucp>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:crystal9.uucp:5490:peg:252200004:000:504
Nf-From: peg.UUCP!mididoc    Jan 12 00:32:00 1991

Reply to Parent Message