Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #7013Re: Does ATM improve HP Deskwriter output?
From: Steve Baumgarten
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 1991 15:42
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 1991 15:42
16 lines
1294 bytes
1294 bytes
In article <0B010004.st0u4u@outpost.UUCP>, peirce@outpost (Michael Peirce) writes: >Right, nothing but hand tuned fonts look decent ON THE SCREEN. 72dpi >just isn't enough resolution to do outline fonts justice. Not so. I use ATM 2.0 with Adobe's LucidaSans at 11pt. all the time, and I think it actually looks better than the 12pt. bitmap. Of course, it helps that it's a sans-serif font, but I'm sometimes pleasantly surprised at how well ATM does when rending fonts on screen. -- Steve Baumgarten | "New York... when civilization falls apart, Davis Polk & Wardwell | remember, we were way ahead of you." baumgart@esquire.dpw.com | cmcl2!esquire!baumgart | - David Letterman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3009@esquire.dpw.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!pyrnj!esquire!esquire.dpw.comReferences:
<0B010004.st0u4u@outpost.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!pyrnj!esquire!esquire.dpw.com From: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com (Steve Baumgarten) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Does ATM improve HP Deskwriter output? Message-ID: <3009@esquire.dpw.com> Date: 30 Jan 91 15:42:55 GMT References: <0B010004.st0u4u@outpost.UUCP> Sender: news@DPW.COM Reply-To: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com (Steve Baumgarten) Organization: Davis Polk & Wardwell Lines: 16 In-reply-to: peirce@outpost.UUCP (Michael Peirce)