🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #7450

Re: Utilities packages for Mac

#7450
From: <blank>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 1991 00:49
65 lines
3117 bytes
mdresser@pbs.org writes:

>In article <443@polluce.sublink.org>, root@polluce.sublink.org (Nadia Pitacco) writes:
>> 
>>   I hope this is not a reposting, but I had some problems
>>   with the previous posting.
>> 
>>   We  are  going  to  buy  an  utility package for our Macs. 
>>   We are considering SUM II vs. Norton Utilities. 
>>   We  would  appreciate  any  comment  and information about 
>>   each  of  this  packages  and/or  comparison between them. 
>>   Suggestions about other similar packages are also welcome.
>> 
>>                   ----------------------------------------------------
>>                   | Informatica Sistemi S.p.A                        | 
>>   //////////////  | via Mercantesse, 3                               |
>>   //   I.S.   //  | 20021 Baranzate MI (Italia)                      |
>>   //////////////  |                                                  |
>>                   |  E-Mail : morgaine@polluce.SUBLINK.ORG           |
>>                   ----------------------------------------------------

>Just a few comments:
>I am totally unimpressed with SUM II.  It can recover some files from
>damaged disks, but has not been able to repair disk problems.

>I saved all the damaged disks I could not fix with SUM and ordered
>Norton.  I just got Norton this week and was able to quickly and
>easily repair every disk.  I was impressed.  Norton recognized
>more problems than SUM and corrected them.  

>I also found Norton more intuitive to use than SUM II.

>I ran SUM on the hard drive of my IIcx and it said all 
>was fine.  I ran Norton and it came back indicating
>some file problems (bundle bits and other things) and 
>corrected these things.

>SUM does an okay job of file recovery, but Norton is
>much better for repairing the disk itself.

>For my position, I need to have a variety of utility
>programs, but if I had to choose just one, I would choose
>Norton.

>Melanie Dresser
>-- 
>**************************************************************
>Melanie L. Dresser	mdresser@pbs.org    
>    Bruce   = Faithful Companion		human	male
>    Max     = Noisy, mouthy, siamese		feline  male
>    Aravis  = Quiet, neurotic siamese		feline  female
>    Tristan = Big, silly German Shepherd 	canine  male
>    Quest   = Trusty steed  -  Appaloosa	equine  male
>********"Is it expensive?  I got a horse ta feed, ya know"*****


I agree wholeheartedly.

Norton is on my hard disk, and SUM II isn't, though I have both.



Dan Walkowski
Univ. of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci.
walkowsk@cs.uiuc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Feb24.004923.12497@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!dawg6844
References: <443@polluce.sublink.org> <1991Feb22.234510.11809@pbs.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!dawg6844
From: dawg6844@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (<blank>)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: Utilities packages for Mac
Message-ID: <1991Feb24.004923.12497@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 24 Feb 91 00:49:23 GMT
References: <443@polluce.sublink.org> <1991Feb22.234510.11809@pbs.org>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 65