Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #9246Re: minimal mac to realistically use macX???
From: C. Haupt
Date: Mon, 20 May 1991 16:26
Date: Mon, 20 May 1991 16:26
55 lines
2675 bytes
2675 bytes
In article <1991May17.121044.994@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
sshws@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov (Herb Schilling) writes:
>In article <1991May17.023402.16678@medisg.Stanford.EDU>
hartzell@CAMIS.Stanford.EDU (George Hartzell) writes:
>>
[intro stuff deleted]
>>
>>I've been told that running macX through an appletalk gateway isn't
>>really usable, so they need to be ethernetable. Any comment?
>>
We are supporting MacX throughout campus as we install Pathworks clients...the
big question here is how busy is your localtalk segment?? For 'usable'
performance we are recommending ethernet--even low use localtalk requires lots
of patience.
>>What kind of horsepower is minimally acceptable? Have you used macX on
>>a(n):
>> - classic
>> - LC
>> - SE/30?
>> - Si
si's and se/30's work fine with ethernet...haven't tested the LC with MacX, but
it appears to have enough juice to cut it. I'd avoid the classic for network
intensive tasks...I wish we had known that earlier...
>>
>>Is 2 meg memory enough?
>>
no, especially if you are going to use system 7 (or System 6, multifinder and
any other apps)...our minimum recommendation is 4meg.
The more open X windows you plan on having, the more memory you will need.
(obviously :^))
[other stuff cut]
> 1. Can you get a 3-button mouse that will work with X windows
> and MacOS ?
yes, haven't tried them yet...two companies that I recall seeing in the monthly
mac mags--the companies' names escape me at the moment.
>
> 2. What is the minimal video subsystem required ?
We are minimally recommending 640x480 screen resolutions...many many x apps
expect 'workstation-size' resolutions, so even 640x480 may not be enough for
some...The 'compact' or 'classic' family screens don't cut it.
Christopher Haupt--RIT/ISC Soft.Supp. VOICENET: (716) 475 5342
INTERNET: cfhacc@ritvax.isc.rit.edu BITNET :cfhacc@ritvax.bitnet
SNAILNET:RIT;ISC;One Lomb Memorial Dr.;
PO BOX 9887;Rochester NY 14623-0887 USA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May20.162628.6752@isc.rit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!fernwood!uupsi!cci632!ritcsh!ultb!newsReferences:
<1991May17.023402.16678@medisg.Stanford.EDU> <1991May17.121044.994@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!fernwood!uupsi!cci632!ritcsh!ultb!news From: cfhacc@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (C. Haupt) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: minimal mac to realistically use macX??? Summary: minimal configs at RIT Keywords: macx minimal Message-ID: <1991May20.162628.6752@isc.rit.edu> Date: 20 May 91 16:26:28 GMT References: <1991May17.023402.16678@medisg.Stanford.EDU> <1991May17.121044.994@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> Sender: news@isc.rit.edu (USENET News System) Distribution: na Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology Lines: 55 Nntp-Posting-Host: nebula