Query: TimesTwo or AutoDoubler 2.0???

Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps

Article #9745

#9745

From: Lance Bernard
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:11

12 lines
1063 bytes

Having a 4/40 powerbook, is Times Two as good as it description indicates, or
would Autodoubler 2.0 be a better bet? (I mostly use ThinkC, GreatWorks, 
Writenow 3.0, Zterm 0.9, ThinkPascal, & QuickBasic.)  I'm asking because the 
description of Times Two looks like a dream come true, & you know how those
sometimes turn out!

Direct post is fine, or net post if you think more useful.  If I get enough
good info by direct post, I will summarize to net.

Thanks!

Lance Bernard (bernard@cs.utk.edu)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1gt496INN4t4@CS.UTK.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!utkcs2!hydra3f.cs.utk.edu!bernard

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!utkcs2!hydra3f.cs.utk.edu!bernard
From: bernard@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (Lance Bernard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Query: TimesTwo or AutoDoubler 2.0???
Date: 18 Dec 1992 18:11:50 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Computer Science
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1gt496INN4t4@CS.UTK.EDU>
Reply-To: bernard@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (Lance Bernard)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra3f.cs.utk.edu
Keywords: Times Two, Autodoubler