Article View: comp.sys.mac.apps
Article #9803Re: MacPascal
From: Rich Siegel
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 16:18
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 16:18
22 lines
1282 bytes
1282 bytes
In article <1992Dec17.150214.20942@midway.uchicago.edu> ejw1@midway.uchicago.edu writes: >>MacPascal is broken under System 6.0.* and 7.* . The problems in 6.0.* can >>be worked around, but certain procedure calls in 7.* give you the bomb. >>Despite this, Symantec, as far as I have been able to ascertain, do not >>intend to do any further development on MacPascal and further will *still* >>sell it in this state. Version 3.0.3 works reasonably well under System 7, though it is not 32-bit clean and is not guaranteed to be totally compatible. Getting updates from a previous version can be problematic, but if you drop me E-mail I may be able to be of assistance. R. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Rich Siegel Internet: siegel@world.std.com Senior Software Engineer GCC Technologies
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzKFyK.E4u@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!siegelReferences:
<1992Nov28.210157.23858@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <P.Etheridge-021292083552@130.123.3.79> <1992Dec17.150214.20942@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!siegel From: siegel@world.std.com (Rich Siegel) Subject: Re: MacPascal Message-ID: <BzKFyK.E4u@world.std.com> Organization: GCC Technologies References: <1992Nov28.210157.23858@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <P.Etheridge-021292083552@130.123.3.79> <1992Dec17.150214.20942@midway.uchicago.edu> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 16:18:20 GMT Lines: 22