Article View: comp.sys.mac.databases
Article #21Re: Helix Express Concerns
From: Jeff Sullivan
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 22:37
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 22:37
36 lines
2441 bytes
2441 bytes
In article <mike_steiner-291092114456@192.35.50.131> mike_steiner@qm.claris.com (Mike Steiner) writes: > I ordered my upgrade to Helix Express on Sept. 30th. Yesterday I received >it (exactly 4 weeks after I mailed my check); it had been shipped on Oct >22; three weeks after I mailed the check. Yesterday, I also received my >bank statement yesterday. The check cleared the bank on October 5th. That >means that Helix Technologies did not ship until 17 days after they cashed >the check (more than that, allowing for the float). I do not like this >policy at all; it gives the impression that they were/are short of cash and >had to receive upgrade fees before they could pay for at least some of the >expenses involved in providing the upgrades. Or, they cashed the check, and shippied HE as soon as it was ready. Maybe they even thought HE was going to be ready 2 weeks earlier than it was. >Another thing that I don't like is that when you run the buckler >application to join the two halves of the application, you have to enter a >four-digit serial number and a 20-character (approximation; I did not count >the exact number of characters) "enabling code." The code is provided on a >mailing label that is too big to tape to the floppy disk. If I had known >that the product had this protection on it, I may not have ordered the >upgrade. I don't like copy protection of any sort whatsoever. You have some really extreme definitions of copy protection--how hard is it to write the SN on your floppy? Now, I haven't had the time to install my HE yet, so I may be singing a different tune come then... jas -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeffrey A. Sullivan | Research Scientist et al. jas@isi.edu (Internet) | Information Sciences Institute 72511,402 (Compuserve) | University of Southern California
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<22771@venera.isi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!isi.edu!venera.isi.edu!jasReferences:
<mike_steiner-291092114456@192.35.50.131>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!isi.edu!venera.isi.edu!jas From: jas@ISI.EDU (Jeff Sullivan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.databases Subject: Re: Helix Express Concerns Message-ID: <22771@venera.isi.edu> Date: 30 Oct 92 22:37:09 GMT Article-I.D.: venera.22771 References: <mike_steiner-291092114456@192.35.50.131> Sender: news@isi.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.databases Organization: USC-ISI Lines: 36 In-reply-to: mike_steiner@qm.claris.com's message of 29 Oct 92 19:51:13 GMT