🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct10.024702.20303@guinness.idbsu.edu>,
djensen@claven.idbsu.edu (Dave J) wrote:
> 
> I have been using Double Helix for 3 years now. One of the main reasons for
> choosing it was the ability to run a client and the server on the same machine
> (no dedicated server for the network). Well, Helix Express (new owners-new
> name) decided to eliminate that capability... without mentioning the fact in
> their upgrade offer. So, after generating a university purchase order,
> receiving the upgrade, and spending the better part of a day updating the
> existing database, trying to figure out why the client on the same machine as
> the server wouldn't function, calling their tech support, I find out the next
> day from a sympathetic tech guy... I can no longer get there from here! 
> 
> Kim at Helix Express, on the receiving end of my indignation and upon hearing
> that I might have to look into other brands, promised "you can try them, but
> you'll come back because all the others are a bitch to program."
> 
> Well, I realize we can continue as before without the upgrade, but I am,
> nevertheless, looking. Ours is a small database and network. We do not want the
> expense of a dedicated server. Are there any other relational databases that
> work without a dedicated server machine?

PMFJI, but why do you need to run a client on the same computer as the
server?  You can access the data base from the server software.  I must be
missing something here.

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Now that I have a reader that can do .sigs, I can't think of a witty |
|one to put here, so I won't.  All normal disclaimers apply.          |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+