Article View: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage
Article #6Re: Seagate Elite-9: should I?
From: Kevin Reynolds
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 1995 13:15
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 1995 13:15
25 lines
1434 bytes
1434 bytes
> Hi folks, > > I thought I'd ask the collected wisdom of the net: are the Seagate Elite-9 > drives (5 1/4", full-height) reliable? Robert, We bought two Elite-9s last fall for my Indigo**2. There was about a three week delay in delivery, but well worth it since there was a hold on the first production run (they said the initial run had mucho problems). Ours were manufactured in the second run (whatever that means). As far as performance, I run them striped on the same SCSI-2 fast channel, and they run really good! I have not had a single problem with these drives. When you can get drives that can store this much this cheaply, why bother with optical? IMHO & FWIW, I would look into the newer 5 1/4, but take your time and wait for a couple of production runs, or just pick up a couple of the 9s -- they appear to have been stable for almost a year. Examine thy timetable and make thy decision... Normal disclaimers apply, don't have any connections, etc. Kevin (-:
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3vqi5d$mk8@polo.iquest.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!polo.iquest.com!usenetReferences:
<hammen-1907951213350001@hammen.sells.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!polo.iquest.com!usenet From: Kevin Reynolds <kreynold@colsa.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Seagate Elite-9: should I? Date: 3 Aug 1995 13:15:25 GMT Organization: interQuest Online Services -- Huntsville, AL Distribution: world Message-ID: <3vqi5d$mk8@polo.iquest.com> References: <hammen-1907951213350001@hammen.sells.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.172.89.52