Article View: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage
Article #99Re: Iomega Zip FAQ 1.6 (FAQ)
From: Ken Macdonald
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 18:57
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 18:57
77 lines
4900 bytes
4900 bytes
In article <413o8i$o5t@dockmaster.phantom.com> steveg@phantom.com (Steve G.) writes: interesting FAQ, and advert :^) >***SECTION 10: IOMEGA ZIP vs SYQUEST EZ135 >SyQuest has released a new drive called the "EZ135" (formerly known by >its code name, "Roadrunner"). This drive costs ~$230 for an external >version (~$200 for an internal version) and uses ~$25 cartridges that >store 135-MB each. EZ135 weighs about 2 lbs (twice as much as the >diet-conscious Zip), but is also about twice as fast. >There are many mixed messages about which drive will ultimately prevail. >However, I personally feel that the Zip drive will be the winner for >several reasons. Here's why: >* The Zip drive is cheaper. Zip costs $200 for external, while EZ135 is >~$30 more. for a measly $30 you get twice the speed and an extra 30MB. How can the ZIP compete with that? Furthermore, the Zip drive is now available internally from >Power Computing and soon as an end-user installation kit, and chances are >it will cost considerably less than the EZ135's internal price of $200.>* Zip cartridges are smaller, lighter, and more transportable. EZ135's >cartridges need to be stored in the same sort of padded carrying case as >"standard" SyQuest cartridges, making then considerably more bulky to >transport. As a result, you'll likely see less of them being used with >portable computers and, consequently, with desktop machines.>* Zip already has a substantial market lead over SyQuest. Historically >speaking, the Mac market hasn't had much in the way of brand-loyalty. >SyQuest drives became the predominant standard not because of any >outstanding features, but simply because they were cheap in comparison to >the more expensive Bernoulli drives. Similarly, the Zip is cheaper than >EZ135. but if people compare the speed, storage space? an extra 300MB per 10 disks is nothing to sneeze at! >* The Zip is being offered as optional equipment in Power Computing's Mac >clones (and hopefully -- eventually -- Apple's own products), whereas the >EZ135 is not. This has the potential to give the Zip drive an even larger >market share. >* Though EZ135 is faster, Zip is already fast enough for the majority of >users. QuickTime movies, sound files, and similar time-intensive files >play just fine from Zip. Only a comparatively few users will actually >_need_ the additional speed that EZ135 offers, and when you consider this >in relation to everything else, the EZ135's speed becomes a >not-so-important factor. what 'everything else'? people may not _need_ the speed, but I think they will _want_ it :^) >* EZ135 cartridges hold about 30-MB more data after formatting, true, but >is that enough to justify a more expensive, heavier drive? I generally don't walk around with my drives :^) I don't think >so. Again, the fact that the Zip is so easily transportable makes it the >better drive, regardless of the data storage capacity. If SyQuest's new >drive were to hold, say, 200-MB or more it would be a considerably >different story. >* People may be angry at SyQuest for "holding out" on the community. More >than a few users have wondered out loud why SyQuest didn't introduce the >EZ135 before Zip came on the scene. The most logical answer is that >SyQuest was making so much money off its other, lower-capacity drives lower capacity? only the 5-1/4" 44MB and 88MB, everything else is over 100MB >that they didn't want to rock the boat by introducing the EZ135. Only >when Iomega started severely cutting into SyQuest's market did SyQuest >respond with the EZ135. In short, it seems that SyQuest was more >interested in lining its own pockets instead of advancing the technology. >While this is probably good for business, it doesn't make the users any >happier. "more than a few users"? I haven't heard ANY users even mention it, quite frankly. >It's ultimately a simple matter of time deciding which drive will >prevail, but if I had to place money on the outcome, I'd bet on Zip. let me guess. you own stock :^) >- - - - - >***SECTION 11: IOMEGA JAZ-THE NEXT GENERATION now this is a good thing! on my Xmas wish list! wonder how Syquest will respond? >steveg@phantom.com >==========
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<macdonald.86.000EF61C@cfcsc.dnd.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ga5.cfcsc.dnd.ca!macdonaldReferences:
<413o8i$o5t@dockmaster.phantom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.sys.atari.st.tech,comp.sys.atari.8bit,comp.sys.amiga.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ga5.cfcsc.dnd.ca!macdonald From: macdonald@cfcsc.dnd.ca (Ken Macdonald) Subject: Re: Iomega Zip FAQ 1.6 (FAQ) Sender: news@cfcsc.dnd.ca (News Administrator) Message-ID: <macdonald.86.000EF61C@cfcsc.dnd.ca> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 18:57:34 GMT References: <413o8i$o5t@dockmaster.phantom.com> Nntp-Posting-Host: ga5.cfcsc.dnd.ca Organization: Canadian Forces Command and Staff College X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]