Re2: Bedrock News

Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3

Article #180

Back to comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3 Previous Next

#180

From: Richard Gillam,GEIS
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:15

15 lines
985 bytes

Vinko--
 
I'll second both of your comments.  I think the comments about what the
development environment ought to be are pointing right to Component Workshop.
I've seen it demonstrated, and it seems to be frialy immature, but with amazing
potential.  I hope it gets the market it deserves.
 
As for the second comment about carrying the framework around as part of the
operating system, this seems to be pointing toward SLM.  One of the things SLM
will hopefully give us is the ability to have all our MacApp (Bedrock) code in
a DLL, rather than carried individually with every application.
 
Rich Gillam
GE Information Services

Technical Details

Message-ID: <724631609.1008557@AppleLink.Apple.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!applelink.apple.com

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!applelink.apple.com
From: GILLAM.R@AppleLink.Apple.COM (Richard Gillam,GEIS)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Subject: Re2: Bedrock News
Message-ID: <724631609.1008557@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:15:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Organization: AppleLink Gateway
Lines: 15