🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Article #216

Re3: Takeover - QA

#216
From: Research SW Design, D Goldman,PR...
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 21:38
16 lines
1087 bytes
Bob --
 
Your point is well-taken, but the important issue to me is that this is NOT an
error with the patch. If my application currently works fine because it
unwittingly takes advantage of a bug in MacApp, then a new release of MacApp in
which that bug is fixed _must_ be allowed to crash my application. If I can't
stand to face such possibilities, then I should never load _any_ update of
MacApp onto my system.
 
This is just like Jesse's scenario in which a code segment now exceeds 32K.
Neither one of these problems is MacApp's responsibility, and neither one of
these problems would be prevented by a _thousand_ person-weeks of QA testing
within a hermetically sealed Apple QA laboratory.
 
-- Dave
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <726183995.5145919@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com
From: RSD@AppleLink.Apple.COM (Research SW Design, D Goldman,PRT)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Subject: Re3: Takeover - QA
Message-ID: <726183995.5145919@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Date: 4 Jan 93 21:38:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Organization: AppleLink Gateway
Lines: 16