ETO-expensive,toothless,obsele

Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3

Article #257

Back to comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3 Previous Next

#257

From: Marx, Peter,PRT
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 19:06

20 lines
1249 bytes

ETO - Expensive, Toothless, and Obselete?
 
I'm a big fan of ETO, but I must agree with Craig Steele from down the street.
Why bother renewing?
 
I can't figure out what's on disc no. 10 - there certainly seems to have been
no progress with MacApp (after all, known to be dead), with C++ (it is being
replaced), or with MPW (dying.) Maybe I need an update to SADE, a product I've
never used? not!
 
If anyone knows of something on ETO that is worth re-subscribing to, please let
me know. I haven't seen much in the way of wonderful development tools coming
out for the Mac in quite a while. I don't have a lot of faith in Bedrock and
don't see why the Macintosh community would at this point. I would love for
Symantec and Apple to prove me wrong, but it seems that their attentions are
being directed at other things (fonts, pc exchange cdevs, etc.)
 
Peter Marx
UCLA Medicine

Technical Details

Message-ID: <726692926.8167640@AppleLink.Apple.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!applelink.apple.com

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!applelink.apple.com
From: MARX.PETER@AppleLink.Apple.COM (Marx, Peter,PRT)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Subject: ETO-expensive,toothless,obsele
Message-ID: <726692926.8167640@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Date: 10 Jan 93 19:06:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Organization: AppleLink Gateway
Lines: 20