🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Article #274

Re: Re2: more ETO griping...

#274
From: DRAPER
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:58
53 lines
2826 bytes
Peter,
 
>Actually, I am old enough to remember both Microsoft and Borland producing
>tools for Macintosh development.
 
I think it takes a great leap of the imagination to consider Microsoft's
entries as *development tools*.  QuickBASIC != QuickC | C version 5.x.
Borland's implementation of TurboPascal was fairly popular among many of my
friends in its day.  But, it was almost abandoned from the beginning by
Borland.  Was it ever a *development tool*?  Where is TurboC++?  What about
it's class library?  What about debuggers?  Where are the real _TOOLS_.
 
>Just to really throw sand back at you, Symantec (actually, Think) is probably
>more commonly used than Apple's tools.
 
So?
 
>I am not sure where you are coming from with your "disagreements." And I don't
>see the anti-trust issues. I do see some foolishness, though.
 
The only thing I disagree with is this statement:
 
>I just wonder why Apple doesn't put EVERYTHING into a subscription service
>(e.g. a high-end Partner program) and COMMIT to making everything available
>there. I don't understand why Apple doesn't see this in their interest. To m
ake
>themselves dependent upon third parties for the development tools is rather
>foolish in my opinion. Why did they do MacApp to begin with?!
 
Why?  I think it's time that Apple started backing off. I think its time to
let other developers besides Symantec into the fray.  I don't think it's
foolish for Apple to allow others to become part of a "total solution" for
the developer.  That so called "dependance" can also be called
"opportunity" for third parties.  Third party success in a stagnant market
such as development tools is necessary for Apple to develop market share.
For the small amount they're giving up, they are creating valuable
opportunities for third parties.
 
 
>Finally, regarding your last comment - "People need to stop complaining about
>what Apple doesn't do, and simply do it themselves" - you CANNOT possibly mean
>that all of us need to go out and write our own quirky class libraries and
>development tools...?!
>
No I don't.  I meant the developer community as a whole producing tools for
itself, rather than waiting for Apple to get around to it for them.
 
 
      |E|J-  ED DRAPER
 rEpar|D|<-  Radiologic/Pathologic Institute
             The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
             draper@odin.mda.uth.tmc.edu
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9301112054.AA08772@odin.mda.uth.tmc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com
From: DRAPER@ODIN.MDA.UTH.TMC.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Subject: Re: Re2: more ETO griping...
Message-ID: <9301112054.AA08772@odin.mda.uth.tmc.edu>
Date: 11 Jan 93 20:58:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Organization: AppleLink Gateway
Lines: 53