Re2: Performance tests...

Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3

Article #32

Back to comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3 Previous Next

#32

From: De Waele Willy - Gent,BE,IHD
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 03:21

18 lines
1036 bytes

Hi,
 
> Then if you have some highly computational sections to write, feel free to do
them as straight Pascal or C (whichever you're more comfortable with;
performance differences usually relate more to the efficiency of your
particular compiler [and the cleverness of your particular programmers] than to
language choice)
 
The language with the most performance is still the assembler (closest to the
hardware), if good designed. No compiler can beat straight assembler coding.
But ... we know all the disavantages of the assembler. Perhaps small pieces
inline coding?
 
Indeed, the choice of a OOP framework or not is depending on other criteria.
 
Regards
Willy

Technical Details

Message-ID: <725427401.7788927@AppleLink.Apple.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com
From: DEWAELE.W@AppleLink.Apple.COM (De Waele Willy - Gent,BE,IHD)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Subject: Re2: Performance tests...
Message-ID: <725427401.7788927@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Date: 27 Dec 92 03:21:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Organization: AppleLink Gateway
Lines: 18