Re: Takeover Example

Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3

Article #38

Back to comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3 Previous Next

#38

From: De Waele Willy - Gent,BE,IHD
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 23:42

20 lines
868 bytes

Hi Dave,
 
I'm complete agree with your scenario, i prefer 3b, because
    1. Apple is the owner of MacApp.
    2. Everyone who is subscribing the ETO receive new updatings as it should
       be.
 
But ...
    1. Will Apple support in the future MacApp? I don't have seen any official
       statement.
    2. Is MADA agree?
 
I think the best is we wait until after NewYear (there are a lot of people
taking holiday during year-end).
 
Regards
Willy
 
ps: WE (group) should do something about this!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <725501066.0949504@AppleLink.Apple.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com
From: DEWAELE.W@AppleLink.Apple.COM (De Waele Willy - Gent,BE,IHD)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Subject: Re: Takeover Example
Message-ID: <725501066.0949504@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Date: 27 Dec 92 23:42:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Organization: AppleLink Gateway
Lines: 20