Article View: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3
Article #5Re: * Takeover Proposal *
From: No Bugs SW, Wayne Vucenic,PAS
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:31
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:31
21 lines
1332 bytes
1332 bytes
Dave, Your proposal sounds good to me, and I'd certainly be willing to pay a reasonable amount to someone who would maintain MacApp. (I think this could probably be done with less than one full time person.) > A LOT of the bug reports are trivial little fixes, with no worries about > distant side-effects, so why should every MacApp developer always have to > individually modify his/her MacApp source? Absolutely! As I read through the "Known Bugs" document, I kept getting annoyed that, contrary to all of Apple's brave pronouncements along the lines of "We'll continue to support MacApp until after everyone has migrated to Bedrock", the reality is that Apple can't even manage to find a few days to have someone apply these trivial fixes, so we won't all have to do it individually. Wayne Vucenic No Bugs Software "Mac Contract Programming in Silicon Valley since 1986"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<724962874.8078667@AppleLink.Apple.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!applelink.apple.com From: WVUCENIC@AppleLink.Apple.COM (No Bugs SW, Wayne Vucenic,PAS) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.oop.macapp3 Subject: Re: * Takeover Proposal * Message-ID: <724962874.8078667@AppleLink.Apple.COM> Date: 21 Dec 92 18:31:00 GMT Sender: daemon@Apple.COM Organization: AppleLink Gateway Lines: 21