🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1gj6q5INN249@agate.berkeley.edu> art@physics.berkeley.edu (Art Ferruzzi) writes:

>I vote in advance for a Prograph newsgroup.

>art@physics.berkeley.edu
>___________________________________________
>All disclaimers apply.

Yes, to a Prograph newsgroup.

Another pro-Prograph newsgroup

Mark Leaman
io92668@maine.maine.edu

<IO92668@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:

>Another pro-Prograph newsgroup

    This newsgroup just started, and there has been basically no
discussion of Prograph in any of the Mac newsgroups to date. Why don't
we wait and see if the Prograph traffic actually warrants its own
newsgroup before people start trying to get one created.

--
-Brian V. Hughes
	     "If you could care less, then why don't you?"

hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades) writes:
><IO92668@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
>>Another pro-Prograph newsgroup
>    This newsgroup just started, and there has been basically no
>discussion of Prograph in any of the Mac newsgroups to date. Why don't
>we wait and see if the Prograph traffic actually warrants its own
>newsgroup before people start trying to get one created.
>-Brian V. Hughes

Becasue the Prograph mailing list has been very active and becasue a number
of people on this newsgroup are interested in a Prograph newsgroup.  Why do
you care anyway?
-Terry

tthiel@cs.uiuc.edu (Terry Thiel) writes:

>hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades) writes:
>><IO92668@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
>>>Another pro-Prograph newsgroup
>>    This newsgroup just started, and there has been basically no
>>discussion of Prograph in any of the Mac newsgroups to date. Why don't
>>we wait and see if the Prograph traffic actually warrants its own
>>newsgroup before people start trying to get one created.
>>-Brian V. Hughes

>Becasue the Prograph mailing list has been very active and becasue a number
>of people on this newsgroup are interested in a Prograph newsgroup.  Why do
>you care anyway?

    Size of a related mailing list has absolutely nothing to do with a
UseNet newsgroup, unless, for some reason, that list is gatewayed to the
group. I personally feel that it is great that a number of people in
this group are interested in Prograph, but the simple fact remains that
you can't just start a new newsgroup. And you will never get anywere,
officially, until you can demonstrate that there is sufficient traffic
to warrant a new group. As for why I care, I happen to be a registered
owner of Prograph, although I haven't done anythign with it yet, and I
also happen to have some experience in the newsgroup creation process
that I was trying to share.

--
-Brian V. Hughes
	     "If you could care less, then why don't you?"