Re: LaserWriter 4/600 PS: good?

Article View: comp.sys.mac.printing

Article #54

Back to comp.sys.mac.printing Previous Next

#54

From: Gary Polando
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 00:00

23 lines
1557 bytes

If you can live with the speed (or lack there of) I recommend it.  I've had
mine for awhile (without the RAM upgrade) and haven't had any problems.


Matthew Greenfield wrote:

> The LaserWriter 4/600 PS is about to become impossible to buy (in the
> UK, anyway). I've always fancied one because they look like a nice
> 'cheap' postscript printer.
>
> Does anyone recommend them whole-heartedly or should I look at the
> Hewlett Packard models?
>
> They thing that concerns me is the RAM. They come with 2mb and are
> difficult/expensive to upgrade. Is 2mb enough for medium range DTP work?
>
> Many thanks,
> Matti.
>
> --
> Matthew Greenfield
> matti@grnfield.u-net.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <351D67C7.5C4095E8@foxinternet.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <1d6lr46.jwpq2slo2jocN@p13.nas2.is3.u-net.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114086,d33c7fe24ec0085e
X-Google-Attributes: gid114086,public
X-Google-Thread: 145a2e,d33c7fe24ec0085e
X-Google-Attributes: gid145a2e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b5a2,d33c7fe24ec0085e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5a2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e148,d33c7fe24ec0085e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e148,public
From: Gary Polando <gdp@foxinternet.net>
Subject: Re: LaserWriter 4/600 PS: good?
Date: 1998/03/28
Message-ID: <351D67C7.5C4095E8@foxinternet.net>
X-Deja-AN: 338790855
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <1d6lr46.jwpq2slo2jocN@p13.nas2.is3.u-net.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: gdp@foxinternet.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.printing,comp.sys.mac.misc,demon.tech.mac,u-net.support.mac

Reply to Parent Message