🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac.programmer.codewarrior
Article #1380

Re: Pro 6, const, and type conversions

#1380
From: Eric Albert
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:00
21 lines
1387 bytes
In article <rang-927714.15311220102000@news.visi.com>, Anton Rang 
<rang@trillium.adaptec.com> wrote:

> In article <ejalbert-8448C2.14083019102000@nntp.stanford.edu>, Eric 
> Albert <ejalbert@stanford.edu> wrote:
> > I'm by no means an expert on automatic type conversions or 
> > const-ness in C++, but I have some code that compiled without 
> > warnings or errors on Pro 5.3 and now doesn't compile on Pro 6, and 
> > I'm wondering why.
> 
> The implicit conversion from 'char **' to 'const char **' is 
> prohibited in C++; the simplest example I could come up with for this 
> is: [two examples snipped]

That makes some sense to me.  Thanks for the explanation.

-Eric

-- 
Eric Albert         ejalbert@stanford.edu
http://www.stanford.edu/~ejalbert/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ejalbert-36A582.14525520102000@nntp.stanford.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <ejalbert-8448C2.14083019102000@nntp.stanford.edu> <rang-927714.15311220102000@news.visi.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10bcce,dde2101fd59215f8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bcce,public
X-Google-Thread: f635e,dde2101fd59215f8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf635e,public
From: Eric Albert <ejalbert@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Pro 6, const, and type conversions
Date: 2000/10/20
Message-ID: <ejalbert-36A582.14525520102000@nntp.stanford.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 683957668
References: <ejalbert-8448C2.14083019102000@nntp.stanford.edu> <rang-927714.15311220102000@news.visi.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer.codewarrior,codewarrior.mac