🚀 go-pugleaf

"Miro Jurisic" <macdev@meeroh.org> skrev i melding
news:macdev-B2A383.10035512022003@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu...
> In article <b2dg2g$1117$1@news.dataguard.no>, "Conrad Weyns"
<weyns@online.no>
> wrote:
>
> > compiler: CW Pro 8.3 Mac & Win.
> > issue: how can I get hold of the real type name of T that is part of a
> > function signature in the following stripped to the bone but working
code:
> >
> > Output of this running program:
> >
> > 1A. tA.report() gives:
> >    function name: _report<long>(long &)
> >    using __typeof__: long
> >    sWoes address: 0x00420460 sWoes = 999
> >    type of _t: long
> >    value of _t 123
> >
> > 2A. tA.const_report() gives:
> >    function name: _report<const long>(const long &)
> >    using __typeof__: long
> >    sWoes address: 0x00420454 sWoes = 999
> >    type of _t: long
> >    value of _t 123
>
> My understanding is that typeof (T) == typeof (const T) == typeof
(volatile T)
> == etc. Perhaps if you explain exactly what you are trying to do with this
> information we can come up with an answer. (Which will involve type
traits, I am
> sure.)

Thanks meeroh, looks like I need to go back to school -again :-(
Ehm, I am lying now, I never went to school!

But this was the kick in the behind that I needed to get to an alternative
solution. I can simply differentiate between the two cases by supplying
*two* template functions:

template <typename T> void _report(T& _t);
template <typename T> void _report(const T& _t);

Works for me :-)
/conrad.





>
> meeroh