🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<noone-3DFD4E.12554819032004@nntp.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>,
 Peter Teeson <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:

> The reason I never upgraded to CW 9 was because of the lack of Java. And 
> now based on that comment from Ron it would appear to be that the reason 
> was that MW did not have sufficient resources to come up with a new 
> compiler.

What I find really annoying is that Ron has been beating around the bush 
regarding Java support (and Windows support, until CW 9 was announced) 
since CW 9 for OS X was announced.  Without a Java compiler in sight, 
there is not doubt that my department is going to drop CodeWarrior and 
move to a combination of Visual C++ and JBuilder as soon as the semester 
is over.  No matter how much I may prefer CW over VC, the main 
justification for using CW in our labs has always been that students 
would have the same environment for their Java-based introductory 
courses and C++-based advanced courses. 

Regards,

jyh.

-- 
=====================================================================
 jean-yves herve'                    /\
 Department of Computer Science      \/   e-mail --> jyh@cs.uri.edu
             and Statistics          /\  
 University of Rhode Island          \/     Tel. --> (401) 874-4400
 Kingston, RI 02881-0816             /\     Fax. --> (401) 874-4617
 USA                                 \/
=====================================================================