🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <mwron-3C529C.11295806082003@enews.newsguy.com>,
 MW Ron <mwron@metrowerks.com> wrote:

> >However, the licensing thing is difficult. I have a main development
> >machine, like everyone, but I also have a bunch of other machines that
> >I test and debug on. Do I have to "disable" one machine in order to use
> >another?
> 
> Technically that was never legal,  the license changed about 4 years ago 
> to a single machine license.  You bring up a good point and i'll pass it 
> on,  can you please send me an e-mail that I can forward to the powers 

I have to admit that I missed the portion of the PR that discussed this, 
but if what is written above is true, then that will definitely 
accelerate our migration to Xcode. I work for another small developer - 
we port games to the Mac, and I find myself having to debug on different 
Macs with different video cards all the time.

It would be a pretty big financial hit for me, if I understand things 
correctly. While CodeWarrior's compile speed is currently a big win, 
setting these Macs up for net compiling with Xcode may eliminate that 
advantage almost entirely.

I'm not sure what Metrowerks' stance is on G5 support - will that be 
something we have to pay for in the future, or will it come as part of a 
free 9.x update for CodeWarrior?

--
Brad Oliver
bradman@pobox.com.AM_SPAY