🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1330@husc6.harvard.edu>, kovar@popvax.harvard.edu (David C. Kovar)
says:

>Classifications:
>  1) Latest virus software or items of similar nature.
>  2) Original freeware that fits in one article.
>  3) Original shareware that fits in one article.
>  4) One article items that don't fit in above classifications.
>  4) Multipart freeware. [Technotes included.]
>  5) Multipart shareware.
>  6) Demo/crippleware.

I like it.  Although I really don't have much of a problem with corporations
using the net to post demos (after all, they do help support the cost of
maintaining the net!), I definitely like the proposed emphasis on freelance
shareware/freeware.

I strongly support the current method of handling the Tech Notes, though:
one big batch of them all at once, periodically.  This way, it's much harder
to miss them when they come around.  :-)

-------
Christopher Tate                    |  "And as I watch the drops of rain
                                    |   Weave their weary paths and die,
cxt105@psuvm.psu.edu                |   I know that I am like the rain;
{...}!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!cxt105   |   There but for the grace of you go I."
cxt105@psuvm.bitnet                 |          -- Simon & Garfunkle