Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #10351Re: Priority scheme for comp.sys.mac.binaries?
From: Leo Breebaart
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1990 09:57
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1990 09:57
22 lines
1473 bytes
1473 bytes
David C. Kovar suggests a priority scheme for comp.binaries.mac: >Classifications: > 1) Latest virus software or items of similar nature. > 2) Original freeware that fits in one article. > 3) Original shareware that fits in one article. > 4) One article items that don't fit in above classifications. > 4) Multipart freeware. [Technotes included.] > 5) Multipart shareware. > 6) Demo/crippleware. > Questions, comments, flames, etc most welcome. This is in my opinion a very reasonable classification, and besides saying so I also want to take the opportunity to add my voice to the growing grumbles of those who are very unhappy with the way that comp.binaries.mac is currently being run. Who *does* decide the order of posting in that group anyhow, and how come we haven't heard from him/her yet? This discussion has been going on some time now, and we might at least get an opinion or justification from the moderator. Leo Breebaart (leo @ duttnph.tudelft.nl)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1076@dutrun.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!dutrun!leoReferences:
<1330@husc6.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!dutrun!leo From: leo@duttnph.tudelft.nl (Leo Breebaart) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Priority scheme for comp.sys.mac.binaries? Message-ID: <1076@dutrun.UUCP> Date: 22 Jan 90 09:57:02 GMT References: <1330@husc6.harvard.edu> Sender: tnphnws@dutrun.UUCP Reply-To: leo@duttnph.UUCP (Leo Breebaart) Organization: Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Lines: 22