Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #11023Re: Xerox suit against Apple update
From: Chandra Bajpai
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 1990 19:27
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 1990 19:27
19 lines
1266 bytes
1266 bytes
In article <10149@wpi.wpi.edu> macman@wpi.wpi.edu (Christopher Silverberg) writes: >Well, as i'm sure some of you may have heard, a judge threw out all but >one charge against Apple Computer brought on by Xerox. And even if Xerox >wins the remaining charge, it will not result in any Apple financial loss. >This is being called a victory for Apple. > >Although on the other hand, this weakens their case against Microsoft and >whoever else they are suing, so all is good... Apple shouldn't win those >cases anyway. > What charges did the judge throw out? and how does this last charge affect Apple? I personally think Apple is guilty from stealing Xerox's technology. I also think Apple is wrong suing HP/Microsoft for something they don't own. Other opinions? -Chandra Bajpai topgun@brandeis.cs.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Mar24.192730.20445@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!think!mintaka!chaos.cs.brandeis.edu!topgunReferences:
<10149@wpi.wpi.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!think!mintaka!chaos.cs.brandeis.edu!topgun From: topgun@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Chandra Bajpai) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Xerox suit against Apple update Message-ID: <1990Mar24.192730.20445@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu> Date: 24 Mar 90 19:27:30 GMT References: <10149@wpi.wpi.edu> Organization: Brandeis University Computer Science Dept Lines: 19