Re: IIcx or IIci as a server

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #11726

#11726

From: John O'Malley
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 1990 17:07

14 lines
1166 bytes

In article <79096@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <elk@cis.ohio-state.edu> writes:
>  I figured the IIcx would be more than adequate for the job, but the
>salesman is recommending a IIci. He says it would be better since it
>is faster.

If you end up deciding on the IIcx, then consider the SE/30 instead.  It's
just as fast as the IIcx.  In addition to both machines having '030 CPUs,
I think they both use the very same ROM chip.  You don't need a big screen
or color for a server, so why not save $700-1000 and get the SE/30?

-John
---
John O'Malley           / Macintosh  / Purdue University / (317)
ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu / Specialist / Computing Center  / 494-1787

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4611@mace.cc.purdue.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!ajq

References: <79096@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!ajq
From: ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu (John O'Malley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: IIcx or IIci as a server
Summary: An SE/30 would be just as good as a IIcx
Message-ID: <4611@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 90 17:07:32 GMT
References: <79096@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: ajq@mace.cc.purdue.edu (John O'Malley)
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message