Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #12041Re: Hard disk benchmarks for Mac IIfx?
From: Dan Pleasant
Date: Thu, 03 May 1990 22:26
Date: Thu, 03 May 1990 22:26
28 lines
1568 bytes
1568 bytes
>Has anyone seen any benchmarks of hard disks yet that include performance
>figures for the Mac IIfx? I'm getting ready to buy one and I'm wondering
>if I can get a faster transfer rate on my SCSI disk by getting a CDC Wren-runner
>drive instead of the usual apple Quantum.
>
>I've heard the standard Apple Quantum drive is no faster on an FX than it
>is on a CI...does anyone know this to be true? If it is true, it would
>seem the drive is the bottleneck and having a faster unit like a
>Wren-Runner would give you better disk transfer rates.
>
>If anyone has done any benchmarking of FX drives (particularly compairing
>their performance against a CI or Mac IIx) I'd like to hear about it.
>
>Greg Corson
>19141 Summers Drive
>South Bend, IN 46637
>(219) 277-5306
>{uunet, rutgers}!iuvax!ndmath!milo
>milo@ndmath
>GEnie: GCORSON
----------
We've timed a long program build (almost completely diskbound) on a Mac IIfx
and a Mac IIci with a large RAM cache. The IIfx finished in 19 minutes.
The IIci finished in 21 minutes. I'd say the disk transfer rate is exactly
the same on both machines.
Dan Pleasant
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<790011@hpnmdla.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!think!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!danReferences:
<1800@ndmath.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!think!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!dan From: dan@hpnmdla.HP.COM (Dan Pleasant) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Hard disk benchmarks for Mac IIfx? Message-ID: <790011@hpnmdla.HP.COM> Date: 3 May 90 22:26:15 GMT References: <1800@ndmath.UUCP> Organization: HP Network Measurements Div, Santa Rosa, CA Lines: 28