Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #1236Re: 68000 vs 68020
From: Dave Haynie
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1989 16:21
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1989 16:21
44 lines
2557 bytes
2557 bytes
in article <SARREL.89Jul10202542@sioux.cis.ohio-state.edu>, sarrel@sioux.cis.ohio-state.edu (Marc Sarrel) says:
> A friend of mine just bought at 16MHz 68000 accelerator card for his
> SE. How much performance difference is there between a 16MHz 68000
> and a 16MHz 68020?
It depends on the system. If you're accelerating a 16 bit machine and not
adding any faster memory, a 68020 will in some cases go about maybe 15%-30%
faster than the 68000, depending on how well the instruction cache gets
utilized. It's actually possible for a 68020 to go slower than a 68000 when
on a 16 bit bus, since the 68020 always prefetches 32 bits for instruction
processing, though sometimes only 16 bits worth actually gets used.
Once you add some 32 bit memory to a 68020, you get real performance increases.
The 16MHz 68020 plus some reasonably fast 32 bit memory will get you about
200%-400% speedup over your 7.8Mhz 68000, and a little better than twice the
performance of a 16MHz 68000 with fast 16 bit memory. That's all integer
performance.
If you add a 68881 or 68882 to the 68020, and your software knows about math
chips, you may get a floating point performance increase from 25x-100x what
a plain 68000 is capable of. I don't know how well the Mac software would
integrate any of this, but the hardware driven increases tend to be similar
among all 680x0 machines.
> Are 68000 accelerators a cost effective alternative?
It depends. Without faster 16 bit memory, it's going to boost your performance
by maybe 15% or so overall. With the faster memory, it'll come close to
doubling the performance, providing the Mac can be set up to use that fast
memory before its on-board slower memory.
> Can you get faster then 16MHz?
Not likely. The 16MHz (actually, 16.6667MHz; Motorola CPUs are rated by the
time of the clock cycle, in this case 60ns) part is currently the fastest
68000 anyone makes.
> --marc
--
Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Systems Engineering) "The Crew That Never Rests"
{uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh PLINK: D-DAVE H BIX: hazy
Be careful what you wish for -- you just might get it
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7260@cbmvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!davehReferences:
<SARREL.89Jul10202542@sioux.cis.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!daveh From: daveh@cbmvax.UUCP (Dave Haynie) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: 68000 vs 68020 Message-ID: <7260@cbmvax.UUCP> Date: 11 Jul 89 16:21:10 GMT References: <SARREL.89Jul10202542@sioux.cis.ohio-state.edu> Distribution: comp Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA Lines: 44